Difference between revisions of "Diels-Alder Reaction Experimental Design"
(→Optimum Experimental Design Problem) |
FelixMueller (Talk | contribs) (→Source Code) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
\dot{G}^i(t) & = & f_x(x^i(t),u^i(t),p)G^i(t) \ + \ f_p(x^i(t),u^i(t),p) \\ | \dot{G}^i(t) & = & f_x(x^i(t),u^i(t),p)G^i(t) \ + \ f_p(x^i(t),u^i(t),p) \\ | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
− | \dot{F}(t) & = & \ | + | \dot{F}(t) & = & \sum\limits_{i=1}^{4} w^i(t) (h^i_x(x^i(t),u^i(t),p)G^i(t))^T (h^i_x(x^i(t),u(t),p)G^i(t)) \\ |
\\ | \\ | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
0.1 & \le & n_{a1} \ \cdot \ M_1 \ + \ n_{a2} \ \cdot \ M_2 \ + \ n_{a4} \ \cdot \ M_4 \\ | 0.1 & \le & n_{a1} \ \cdot \ M_1 \ + \ n_{a2} \ \cdot \ M_2 \ + \ n_{a4} \ \cdot \ M_4 \\ | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
Line 99: | Line 95: | ||
\vartheta_{up} + 273 & t \in [8,t_{end}] | \vartheta_{up} + 273 & t \in [8,t_{end}] | ||
\end{array} \right. \\ | \end{array} \right. \\ | ||
− | & & x \in \mathcal{X},\,u \in \mathcal{U},\, p \in P . | + | & & x \in \mathcal{X},\,u \in \mathcal{U},\, p \in P \\ |
+ | \dot{z}^i(t) & = & w^i(t) \\ | ||
+ | z(0) & = & 0 \\ | ||
+ | w^i(t) &\in& [0,1] \\ | ||
+ | 0 & \le & 4 - z^i(t_f). \\ | ||
\end{array} | \end{array} | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
Line 204: | Line 204: | ||
|Symbol | |Symbol | ||
|Interval | |Interval | ||
+ | |Initial value Exp 1 | ||
+ | |Initial value Exp 2 | ||
+ | |Initial value Exp 3 | ||
+ | |Initial value Exp 4 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Initial molar number 1 | |Initial molar number 1 | ||
|<math>n_{a1}</math> | |<math>n_{a1}</math> | ||
− | |[0 | + | |[0,10.0] |
+ | |1.0 | ||
+ | |1.0 | ||
+ | |1.0 | ||
+ | |1.0 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Initial molar number 2 | |Initial molar number 2 | ||
|<math>n_{a2}</math> | |<math>n_{a2}</math> | ||
− | |[0 | + | |[0,10.0] |
+ | |1.0 | ||
+ | |1.0 | ||
+ | |1.0 | ||
+ | |1.0 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Initial molar number 4 | |Initial molar number 4 | ||
|<math>n_{a4}</math> | |<math>n_{a4}</math> | ||
|[0.4,9.0] | |[0.4,9.0] | ||
+ | |2.0 | ||
+ | |2.0 | ||
+ | |2.0 | ||
+ | |2.0 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Concentration of the catalyst | |Concentration of the catalyst | ||
|<math>c_{kat}</math> | |<math>c_{kat}</math> | ||
− | |[ | + | |[0,10.0] |
+ | |0.0 | ||
+ | |1.0 | ||
+ | |2.0 | ||
+ | |3.0 | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 229: | Line 249: | ||
|Time interval | |Time interval | ||
|Value interval | |Value interval | ||
− | |Initial value | + | |Initial value Exp 1 |
+ | |Initial value Exp 2 | ||
+ | |Initial value Exp 3 | ||
+ | |Initial value Exp 4 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Initial molar number 1 | |Initial molar number 1 | ||
Line 235: | Line 258: | ||
|<math>[t_0,2]</math> | |<math>[t_0,2]</math> | ||
|[20.0,100.0] | |[20.0,100.0] | ||
+ | |20.0 | ||
+ | |60.0 | ||
+ | |40.0 | ||
|20.0 | |20.0 | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 241: | Line 267: | ||
|<math>[2,8]</math> | |<math>[2,8]</math> | ||
|[20.0,100.0] | |[20.0,100.0] | ||
+ | |20.0 | ||
+ | |60.0 | ||
+ | |40.0 | ||
|20.0 | |20.0 | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 247: | Line 276: | ||
|<math>[8,t_{end}]</math> | |<math>[8,t_{end}]</math> | ||
|[20.0,100.0] | |[20.0,100.0] | ||
+ | |20.0 | ||
+ | |60.0 | ||
+ | |40.0 | ||
|20.0 | |20.0 | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 262: | Line 294: | ||
== Source Code == | == Source Code == | ||
− | * The VPLAN code using [[:Category: VPLAN | VPLAN | + | * The VPLAN code using [[:Category: VPLAN | VPLAN]] can be found in: [[Diels-Alder Reaction Experimental Design (VPLAN)]] |
== References == | == References == |
Latest revision as of 15:17, 29 July 2016
The Diels-Alder Reaction is an organic chemical reaction. A conjugated diene and a substituted alkene react and form a substituted cyclohexene system. Stefan Körkel used this model in his PhD thesis to compute optimum experimental designs.
Contents
Model Formulation
The reactionkinetics can be modelled by the following differential equation system:
The reaction velocity constant consists of two parts. One part reflects the non-catalytic and the other the catalytic reaction. The velocity law follows the Arrhenius relation
Total mass:
Temperature in Kelvin:
The ODE system is summarized to:
Constraints
The control variables are constrained with respect to the mass of sample weights (initial mass):
and to the mass of active ingredient content (fraction of active substances):
Optimum Experimental Design Problem
The aim is to compute an optimal experimental design which minimizes the uncertainties of the parameters . So, we have to solve the following optimum experimental design problem:
Name | Symbol | Initial value () |
Molar number 1 | ||
Molar number 2 | ||
Molar number 3 | ||
Solvent |
Name | Symbol | Value |
Molar Mass | 0.1362 | |
Molar Mass | 0.09806 | |
Molar Mass | 0.23426 | |
Molar Mass | 0.236 | |
Universal gas constant | 8.314 | |
Reference temperature | 293 | |
St.dev of measurement error | 1 |
Remember, in an optimum experimental design problem the parameters of the model are fixed. But, we minimize the parameter's uncertainties by optimizing over the control variables and functions.
Name | Symbol | Value |
Steric factor | ||
Steric factor | ||
Activation energie | ||
Activation energie | ||
Catalyst deactivation coefficient |
with
Name | Symbol | Interval | Initial value Exp 1 | Initial value Exp 2 | Initial value Exp 3 | Initial value Exp 4 |
Initial molar number 1 | [0,10.0] | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
Initial molar number 2 | [0,10.0] | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
Initial molar number 4 | [0.4,9.0] | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | |
Concentration of the catalyst | [0,10.0] | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 |
Name | Symbol | Time interval | Value interval | Initial value Exp 1 | Initial value Exp 2 | Initial value Exp 3 | Initial value Exp 4 |
Initial molar number 1 | [20.0,100.0] | 20.0 | 60.0 | 40.0 | 20.0 | ||
Initial molar number 1 | [20.0,100.0] | 20.0 | 60.0 | 40.0 | 20.0 | ||
Initial molar number 1 | [20.0,100.0] | 20.0 | 60.0 | 40.0 | 20.0 |
Measurement grid
Source Code
- The VPLAN code using VPLAN can be found in: Diels-Alder Reaction Experimental Design (VPLAN)
References
R. T. Morrison and R.N. Boyd. Organic Chemistry. Allyn and Bacon, Inc., 4th edition, 1983 S. Körkel. Numerische Methoden für Optimale Versuchsplanungsprobleme bei nichtlinearen DAE-Modellen.PhD thesis, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelber,2002