Jump to content

Annihilation of calcium oscillations with PLC activation inhibition: Difference between revisions

From mintOC
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:
  & x(0) &=& (0.03966, 1.09799, 0.00142, 1.65431)^T, \\
  & x(0) &=& (0.03966, 1.09799, 0.00142, 1.65431)^T, \\
  & x(t) & \ge & 0.0, \\
  & x(t) & \ge & 0.0, \\
  & w_1(t) &\in&  \{0, w^{\mathrm{max}}\}, \\
  & w_1(t) &\in&  \{1, w^{\mathrm{max}}\}, \\
  & w_2(t) &\in&  \{0, 1\}, \\
  & w_2(t) &\in&  \{0, 1\}, \\
  & w^{\mathrm{max}} & \ge & 1.1, \\
  & w^{\mathrm{max}} & \ge & 1.1, \\

Revision as of 21:48, 12 November 2008

Annihilation of calcium oscillations with PLC activation inhibition
State dimension: 1
Differential states: 4
Discrete control functions: 2
Interior point equalities: 4


This control problem is closely related to Annihilation of calcium oscillations. The only difference is an additional control function, the inhibition of PLC activation. We state only the differences in this article.

Mathematical formulation

For t[t0,tf] almost everywhere the mixed-integer optimal control problem is given by

minx,w,wmaxt0tf||x(τ)x~||22+p1w1(τ)+p2w2(τ)dτs.t.x˙0=k1+k2x0k3x0x1x0+K4k5x0x2x0+K6x˙1=(1w2)k7x0k8x1x1+K9x˙2=k10x1x2x3x3+K11+k12x1+k13x0k14x2w1x2+K15k16x2x2+K17+x310x˙3=k10x1x2x3x3+K11+k16x2x2+K17x310x(0)=(0.03966,1.09799,0.00142,1.65431)T,x(t)0.0,w1(t){1,wmax},w2(t){0,1},wmax1.1,wmax1.3.

Note that we write w1(t) instead of w(t) and have an additional control function w2(t). The regularization parameters are set to p1=p2=100.

Reference Solutions

A solution for this problem is described in <bibref>Lebiedz2005</bibref>. A local minimum that is actually slightly worse than the solution provided for only one control, is shown in the next plots.

Variants

Only one control function.

References

<bibreferences/>