Difference between revisions of "Fuller's initial value problem"

From mintOC
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Dimensions |nd = 1 |nx = 2 |nw = 1 |nre = 2 }}<!-- Do not insert line break here or Dimensions Box moves up in the layout... -->This site describ...")
 
(Reference Solutions)
Line 34: Line 34:
 
If the problem is relaxed, i.e., we demand that <math>w(t)</math> be in the continuous interval <math>[0, 1]</math> instead of the binary choice <math>\{0,1\}</math>, the optimal solution can be determined by means of direct optimal control.  
 
If the problem is relaxed, i.e., we demand that <math>w(t)</math> be in the continuous interval <math>[0, 1]</math> instead of the binary choice <math>\{0,1\}</math>, the optimal solution can be determined by means of direct optimal control.  
  
The optimal objective value of the relaxed problem with  <math> n_t=12000, \, n_u=400 </math> is <math>x_2(t_f) =1.82875272</math>. The objective value of the binary controls obtained by Combinatorial Integral Approimation (CIA) is <math>x_2(t_f) =1.82878681</math>.   
+
The optimal objective value of the relaxed problem with  <math> n_t=6000, \, n_u=150 </math> is <math>1.45412214e-05</math>. The objective value of the binary controls obtained by Combinatorial Integral Approimation (CIA) is <math>2.40273813e-05</math>.   
  
<gallery caption="Reference solution plots" widths="180px" heights="140px" perrow="2">
+
<gallery caption="Reference solution plots" widths="180px" heights="140px" perrow="4">
  Image:MmlotkaRelaxed_12000_30_1.png| Optimal relaxed controls and states determined by an direct approach with ampl_mintoc (Radau collocation)  and <math>n_t=12000, \, n_u=400</math>.
+
  Image:FullerRelaxed 6000 40 1.png| Optimal relaxed states determined by an direct approach with ampl_mintoc (Radau collocation)  and <math>n_t=6000, \, n_u=150</math>.
 
  Image:MmlotkaCIA 12000 30 1.png| Optimal binary controls and states determined by an direct approach (Radau collocation) with ampl_mintoc and <math>n_t=12000, \, n_u=400</math>. The relaxed controls were approximated by Combinatorial Integral Approximation.
 
  Image:MmlotkaCIA 12000 30 1.png| Optimal binary controls and states determined by an direct approach (Radau collocation) with ampl_mintoc and <math>n_t=12000, \, n_u=400</math>. The relaxed controls were approximated by Combinatorial Integral Approximation.
 
</gallery>
 
</gallery>

Revision as of 17:22, 8 January 2018

Fuller's initial value problem
State dimension: 1
Differential states: 2
Discrete control functions: 1
Interior point equalities: 2

This site describes a Fuller's problem variant with no terminal constraints and additional Mayer term for penalizing deviation from given reference values.

Mathematical formulation

For t \in [t_0, t_f] almost everywhere the mixed-integer optimal control problem is given by


\begin{array}{llcl}
 \displaystyle \min_{x, w} & \int_{0}^{1} x_0^2 & \; \mathrm{d} t + (x(t_f)-x_T)^2 \\[1.5ex]
 \mbox{s.t.} & \dot{x}_0 & = & x_1, \\
 & \dot{x}_1 & = & 1 - 2 \; w, \\[1.5ex]
 & x(0) &=& x_S, \\
 & w(t) &\in&  \{0, 1\}.
\end{array}


Parameters

We use x_S = x_T = (0.01, 0)^T.


Reference Solutions

If the problem is relaxed, i.e., we demand that w(t) be in the continuous interval [0, 1] instead of the binary choice \{0,1\}, the optimal solution can be determined by means of direct optimal control.

The optimal objective value of the relaxed problem with  n_t=6000, \, n_u=150  is 1.45412214e-05. The objective value of the binary controls obtained by Combinatorial Integral Approimation (CIA) is 2.40273813e-05.