Difference between revisions of "Lotka Volterra multi-arcs problem"
ClemensZeile (Talk | contribs) |
ClemensZeile (Talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
\begin{array}{rcl} | \begin{array}{rcl} | ||
[t_0, t_f] &=& [0, 18],\\ | [t_0, t_f] &=& [0, 18],\\ | ||
− | (c_0, c_1 | + | (c_0, c_1) &=& (0.4, 0.2),\\ |
p_{0}(t) &=& \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} | p_{0}(t) &=& \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} | ||
1 \quad \quad &\text{for } \ t\in [0,7.2],\\ | 1 \quad \quad &\text{for } \ t\in [0,7.2],\\ | ||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
1 \quad \quad &\text{for } \ t\in [12,18]. | 1 \quad \quad &\text{for } \ t\in [12,18]. | ||
\end{array} \right. \\ | \end{array} \right. \\ | ||
− | p_1(t) & | + | p_1(t) &\equiv& p_0(t). |
\end{array} | \end{array} | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
<gallery caption="Reference solution plots" widths="180px" heights="140px" perrow="2"> | <gallery caption="Reference solution plots" widths="180px" heights="140px" perrow="2"> | ||
− | Image: | + | Image:LotkaRelaxed 18000 60 1.png| Optimal relaxed controls and states determined by an direct approach with ampl_mintoc (Radau collocation) and <math>n_t=18000, \, n_u=300</math>. |
− | Image: | + | Image:LotkaCIA 18000 60 1.png| Optimal binary controls and states determined by an direct approach (Radau collocation) with ampl_mintoc and <math>n_t=18000, \, n_u=300</math>. The relaxed controls were approximated by Combinatorial Integral Approximation. |
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:17, 21 December 2017
Lotka Volterra multi-arcs problem | |
---|---|
State dimension: | 1 |
Differential states: | 3 |
Discrete control functions: | 1 |
Interior point equalities: | 3 |
This site describes a Lotka Volterra variant with three singular arcs instead of only one in the standard variant.
Mathematical formulation
The mixed-integer optimal control problem is given by
Here the differential states describe the biomasses of prey and predator, respectively. The third differential state is used here to transform the objective, an integrated deviation, into the Mayer formulation . This problem variant allows to choose between three different fishing options.
Parameters
These fixed values are used within the model.
Reference Solutions
If the problem is relaxed, i.e., we demand that be in the continuous interval instead of the binary choice , the optimal solution can be determined by means of direct optimal control.
The optimal objective value of the relaxed problem with is . The objective value of the binary controls obtained by Combinatorial Integral Approimation (CIA) is .