Difference between revisions of "Lotka Volterra absolute fishing problem"

From mintOC
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Dimensions |nd = 1 |nx = 3 |nw = 5 |nre = 3 }}<!-- Do not insert line break here or Dimensions Box moves up in the layout... -->This site describ...")
 
Line 46: Line 46:
 
== Reference Solutions ==
 
== Reference Solutions ==
  
−
If the problem is relaxed, i.e., we demand that <math>w(t)</math> be in the continuous interval <math>[0, 1]</math> instead of the binary choice <math>\{0,1\}</math>, the optimal solution can be determined by means of direct optimal control.  
+
If the problem is relaxed, i.e., we demand that <math>w(t)</math> is in the continuous interval <math>[0, 1]</math> rather than being binary, the optimal solution can be determined by means of direct optimal control.  
  
−
The optimal objective value of the relaxed problem with  <math> n_t=12000, \, n_u=400 </math> is <math>x_2(t_f) =1.82875272</math>. The objective value of the binary controls obtained by Combinatorial Integral Approimation (CIA) is <math>x_2(t_f) =1.82878681</math>.   
+
The optimal objective value of the relaxed problem with  <math> n_t=12000, \, n_u=150 </math> is <math>x_2(t_f) =0.345768563</math>. The objective value of the solution with binary controls obtained by Combinatorial Integral Approximation (CIA) is <math>x_2(t_f) =0.348617982</math>.   
  
 
<gallery caption="Reference solution plots" widths="180px" heights="140px" perrow="2">
 
<gallery caption="Reference solution plots" widths="180px" heights="140px" perrow="2">

Revision as of 11:56, 14 October 2019

Lotka Volterra absolute fishing problem
State dimension: 1
Differential states: 3
Discrete control functions: 5
Interior point equalities: 3

This site describes a Lotka Volterra variant with five binary controls that all represent fishing of an absolute biomass.

Mathematical formulation

The mixed-integer optimal control problem is given by

\begin{array}{llclr} \displaystyle \min_{x, w} & x_2(t_f) \\[1.5ex] \mbox{s.t.} & \dot{x}_0 & = & x_0 - x_0 x_1 - \; \sum\limits_{i=1}^{5} c_{0,i}\; w_i, \\ & \dot{x}_1 & = & - x_1 + x_0 x_1 - \; \sum\limits_{i=1}^{5} c_{1,i}\; w_i, \\ & \dot{x}_2 & = & (x_0 - 1)^2 + (x_1 - 1)^2, \\[1.5ex] & x(0) &=& (0.5, 0.7, 0)^T, \\ & \sum\limits_{i=1}^{5}w_i(t) &=& 1, \\ & w_i(t) &\in& \{0, 1\}, \quad i=1\ldots 5. \end{array}

Here the differential states (x_0, x_1) describe the biomasses of prey and predator, respectively. The third differential state is used here to transform the objective, an integrated deviation, into the Mayer formulation \min \; x_2(t_f). This problem variant allows to choose between three different fishing options.

Parameters

These fixed values are used within the model.

\begin{array}{rcl} [t_0, t_f] &=& [0, 12],\\ (c_{0,1}, c_{1,1}) &=& (0.2, 0.1),\\ (c_{0,2}, c_{1,2}) &=& (0.4, 0.2),\\ (c_{0,3}, c_{1,3}) &=& (0.01, 0.1),\\ (c_{0,4}, c_{1,4}) &=& (0, 0),\\ (c_{0,5}, c_{1,5}) &=& (-0.1, -0.2). \end{array}

Reference Solutions

If the problem is relaxed, i.e., we demand that w(t) is in the continuous interval [0, 1] rather than being binary, the optimal solution can be determined by means of direct optimal control.

The optimal objective value of the relaxed problem with n_t=12000, \, n_u=150 is x_2(t_f) =0.345768563. The objective value of the solution with binary controls obtained by Combinatorial Integral Approximation (CIA) is x_2(t_f) =0.348617982.

  • Reference solution plots

  • Optimal relaxed controls and states determined by an direct approach with ampl_mintoc (Radau collocation) and n_t=12000, \, n_u=400.

  • Optimal binary controls and states determined by an direct approach (Radau collocation) with ampl_mintoc and n_t=12000, \, n_u=400. The relaxed controls were approximated by Combinatorial Integral Approximation.

Retrieved from "https://mintoc.de/index.php?title=Lotka_Volterra_absolute_fishing_problem&oldid=2308"