Difference between revisions of "Urethane"
RobertLampel (Talk | contribs) (→Mathematical formulation) |
RobertLampel (Talk | contribs) (→References) |
||
Line 219: | Line 219: | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
− | + | ||
− | < | + | <span id="KoerkelDiss">[1]</span> "Numerische Methoden für Optimale Versuchsplanungsprobleme bei nichtlinearen DAE-Modellen " by S. Körkel <br> |
− | < | + | <span id="Koerkel2000">[2]</span> "Numerical methods for optimum experimental design in DAE systems" by I. Bauer, H.G. Bock, S. Körkel and J.P. Schlöder <br> |
− | + | <span id="OEDUDE">[3]</span> "Optimal Experimental Design for Universal Differential Equations" by C. Plate, C.J. Martensen and S. Sager | |
<!--List of all categories this page is part of. List characterization of solution behavior, model properties, ore presence of implementation details (e.g., AMPL for AMPL model) here --> | <!--List of all categories this page is part of. List characterization of solution behavior, model properties, ore presence of implementation details (e.g., AMPL for AMPL model) here --> |
Revision as of 13:30, 12 November 2024
Urethane | |
---|---|
State dimension: | 1 |
Differential states: | 11 |
Discrete control functions: | 2 |
Path constraints: | 4 |
Interior point equalities: | 11 |
This page describes the Optimal Experimental Design Problem for the Urethane Reaction. The following formulation is taken from the PhD thesis "Numerische Methoden für Optimale Versuchsplanungsprobleme bei nichtlinearen DAE-Modellen" by Stefan Körkel.
Contents
Chemical background
The reaction scheme of the urethane reaction is as follows:
For ease of notation the chemical substances use the abbreviations
Letter | Substance |
---|---|
A | Phenyl Isocyanate |
B | Butanol |
C | Urethane (Main Product) |
D | Allophanate (Secondary Product) |
E | Isocyanurate (Byproduct) |
L | Dimethyl Sulfoxide |
The reactor for the urethane reaction is a stirred tank and can be operated as a batch or semi-batch process with up to two feeds. In the reactor, phenyl isocyanate and butanol can be initially charged in the solvent dimethyl sulfoxide. In feed 1, phenyl isocyanate in dimethyl sulfoxide can be added, and in feed 2, butanol in dimethyl sulfoxide can be added. The internal temperature of the reactor is controllable.
Mathematical formulation
We can model this process using a nonlinear DAE model
with
The molar numbers of the species to and of the solvent are the state variables of the DAE system. There are eight unknown parameters in this model:
The two feeds are modelled by two monotonously increasing control functions
describing the profiles of the accumulated feeds. Multiplied with the initial molar numbers within the feed vessels, we get the feed molar numbers:
The third control function is the temperature profile
Each experiment lasts 80 h. The beginning is Monday, 8 pm, the end Thursday, 4 pm. During the nights, the feed rates and the heating=cooling rate have to be zero due to safety rules. Further control variables for experimental design are
These quantities are connected to the initial molar numbers as follows
The remaining quantities are constants and shown in the parameter section. Three measurement methods are available:
In each experiment, 16 measurements can be selected out of 30 possible ones. We parametrize the time depending control functions using piecewise linear and continuous polynomials. Altogether we have 90 experimental design variables for each experiment: 7 control variables, 7 initial molar numbers, 30 weights on the measurements, and 46 variables due to the parametrization of the control functions.
Parameters
Intial Values | |
Constants | ||
Molar Mass | Density | Reference Temperature |
---|---|---|
molar gas constant |
||
Optimal Experimental Design Problem
To be specified.
Miscellaneous and Further Reading
To be specified.
References
[1] "Numerische Methoden für Optimale Versuchsplanungsprobleme bei nichtlinearen DAE-Modellen " by S. Körkel
[2] "Numerical methods for optimum experimental design in DAE systems" by I. Bauer, H.G. Bock, S. Körkel and J.P. Schlöder
[3] "Optimal Experimental Design for Universal Differential Equations" by C. Plate, C.J. Martensen and S. Sager