Difference between revisions of "Bioreactor"
FelixMueller (Talk | contribs) |
FelixMueller (Talk | contribs) |
||
(33 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|nx = 3 | |nx = 3 | ||
|nu = 1 | |nu = 1 | ||
− | |nc = | + | |nc = 2 |
|nre = 3 | |nre = 3 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Originally the problem seems to be motivated by: | Originally the problem seems to be motivated by: | ||
+ | <bib id="Versyck1999" /> | ||
VERSYCK, KARINA J., and JAN F. VAN IMPE. | VERSYCK, KARINA J., and JAN F. VAN IMPE. | ||
Line 99: | Line 100: | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
− | \begin{array}{ | + | \begin{array}{clcl} |
− | \displaystyle \min_{x,S_f} & J(x | + | \displaystyle \min_{x,S_f} & J(x,S_f)\\[1.5ex] |
− | \mbox{s.t.} & \dot{x} | + | \mbox{s.t.} |
− | & x(0) = (6.5,12,22)^T \\ | + | & \dot{x} & = & f(x,S_f)\\ |
− | & | + | & x(0) & = & (6.5,12,22)^T \\ |
− | S_f \in [28.7,40]. | + | & S_f & \in &[28.7,40]. |
\end{array} | \end{array} | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
Line 131: | Line 132: | ||
<!--List of all categories this page is part of. List characterization of solution behavior, model properties, ore presence of implementation details (e.g., AMPL for AMPL model) here --> | <!--List of all categories this page is part of. List characterization of solution behavior, model properties, ore presence of implementation details (e.g., AMPL for AMPL model) here --> | ||
− | [[Category:MIOCP]] [[Category: | + | [[Category:MIOCP]] [[Category: ODE model]] [[Category:Chemical engineering]] |
+ | [[Category:Bang bang]] |
Latest revision as of 09:27, 27 July 2016
Bioreactor | |
---|---|
State dimension: | 1 |
Differential states: | 3 |
Continuous control functions: | 1 |
Path constraints: | 2 |
Interior point equalities: | 3 |
The bioreactor problem describes an substrate that is converted to a product by the biomass in the reactor. It has three states and a control that is describing the feed concentration of the substrate. The problem is taken from the examples folder of the ACADO toolkit described in: [Houska2011a]The entry doesn't exist yet.
Houska, Boris, Hans Joachim Ferreau, and Moritz Diehl. "ACADO toolkit—An open‐source framework for automatic control and dynamic optimization." Optimal Control Applications and Methods 32.3 (2011): 298-312.
Originally the problem seems to be motivated by: [Versyck1999]The entry doesn't exist yet.
VERSYCK, KARINA J., and JAN F. VAN IMPE. "Feed rate optimization for fed-batch bioreactors: From optimal process performance to optimal parameter estimation." Chemical Engineering Communications 172.1 (1999): 107-124.
Contents
Model Formulation
The dynamic model is an ODE model:
The right-hand side of these equations will be summed up in .
The three states describe the concentration of the biomass (), the substrate (), and the product () in the reactor. In steady state the feed and outlet are equal and dilute all three concentrations with a ratio . The biomass grows with a rate , while it eats up the substrate with the rate and produces product at a rate . The rate is given by:
The fixed parameters (constants) of the model are as follows.
Name | Symbol | Value | Unit |
Dilution | 0.15 | [-] | |
Rate coefficient | 22 | [-] | |
Rate coefficient | 1.2 | [-] | |
Rate coefficient | 50 | [-] | |
Substrate to Biomass rate | 0.4 | [-] | |
Linear slope | 2.2 | [-] | |
Linear intercept | 0.2 | [-] | |
Maximal growth rate | 0.48 | [-] |
Mathematical formulation
Writing shortly for the states in vector notation the OCP reads:
Objective
Reference Solution
Here we present the reference solution of the reimplemented example in the ACADO code generation with matlab. The source code is given in the next section.
Source Code
Model descriptions are available in