Difference between revisions of "F-8 aircraft"
m (Added plots) |
(Added reformulation) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
\begin{array}{llcl} | \begin{array}{llcl} | ||
\displaystyle \min_{x, w, T} & T \\[1.5ex] | \displaystyle \min_{x, w, T} & T \\[1.5ex] | ||
− | \mbox{s.t.} & \dot{x}_0 &=& -0.877 \; x_0 + x_2 - 0.088 \; x_0 \; x_2 + 0.47 \; x_0^2 - 0.019 \; x_1^2 - x_0^2 \; x_2 | + | \mbox{s.t.} & \dot{x}_0 &=& -0.877 \; x_0 + x_2 - 0.088 \; x_0 \; x_2 + 0.47 \; x_0^2 - 0.019 \; x_1^2 - x_0^2 \; x_2 + 3.846 \; x_0^3 \\ |
− | + | &&& - 0.215 \; w + 0.28 \; x_0^2 \; w + 0.47 \; x_0 \; w^2 + 0.63 \; w^3 \\ | |
& \dot{x}_1 &=& x_2 \\ | & \dot{x}_1 &=& x_2 \\ | ||
& \dot{x}_2 &=& -4.208 \; x_0 - 0.396 \; x_2 - 0.47 \; x_0^2 - 3.564 \; x_0^3 \\ | & \dot{x}_2 &=& -4.208 \; x_0 - 0.396 \; x_2 - 0.47 \; x_0^2 - 3.564 \; x_0^3 \\ | ||
− | & x(0) &=& | + | & x(0) &=& (0.4655,0,0)^T, \\ |
− | & x(T) &=& | + | & x(T) &=& (0,0,0)^T, \\ |
& w(t) &\in& \{-0.05236,0.05236\}. | & w(t) &\in& \{-0.05236,0.05236\}. | ||
\end{array} | \end{array} | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
<math>x_0</math> is the angle of attack in radians, <math>x_1</math> is the pitch angle, <math>x_2</math> is the pitch rate in rad/s, and the control function <math>w = w(t)</math> is the tail deflection angle in radians. This model goes back to Garrard<bibref>Garrard1977</bibref>. | <math>x_0</math> is the angle of attack in radians, <math>x_1</math> is the pitch angle, <math>x_2</math> is the pitch rate in rad/s, and the control function <math>w = w(t)</math> is the tail deflection angle in radians. This model goes back to Garrard<bibref>Garrard1977</bibref>. | ||
− | + | In the control problem, both initial as terminal values of the differential states are fixed. | |
− | == | + | == Reformulation == |
− | + | The control w(t) is restricted to take values from a finite set only. Hence, the control problem can be reformulated equivalently to | |
<math> | <math> | ||
− | \begin{array}{ | + | \begin{array}{llcl} |
− | x_0 &=& (0.4655,0,0)^T, \\ | + | \displaystyle \min_{x, w, T} & T \\[1.5ex] |
− | + | \mbox{s.t.} & \dot{x}_0 &=& -0.877 \; x_0 + x_2 - 0.088 \; x_0 \; x_2 + 0.47 \; x_0^2 - 0.019 \; x_1^2 - x_0^2 \; x_2 + 3.846 \; x_0^3 \\ | |
− | \end{array} | + | &&& - \left( 0.215 \; \xi + 0.28 \; x_0^2 \; \xi + 0.47 \; x_0 \; \xi^2 + 0.63 \; \xi^3 \right) \; w \\ |
+ | &&& - \left( - 0.215 \; \xi - 0.28 \; x_0^2 \; \xi + 0.47 \; x_0 \; \xi^2 - 0.63 \; \xi^3 \right) \; (1 - w) \\ | ||
+ | & \dot{x}_1 &=& x_2 \\ | ||
+ | & \dot{x}_2 &=& -4.208 \; x_0 - 0.396 \; x_2 - 0.47 \; x_0^2 - 3.564 \; x_0^3 \\ | ||
+ | & x(0) &=& (0.4655,0,0)^T, \\ | ||
+ | & x(T) &=& (0,0,0)^T, \\ | ||
+ | & w(t) &\in& \{0,1\}, | ||
+ | \end{array} | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | with <math>\xi = 0.05236</math>. Note that there is a bijection between optimal solutions of the two problems. | ||
== Reference solutions == | == Reference solutions == |
Revision as of 16:18, 1 November 2008
F-8 aircraft | |
---|---|
State dimension: | 1 |
Differential states: | 3 |
Discrete control functions: | 1 |
Interior point equalities: | 6 |
The F-8 aircraft control problem is based on a very simple aircraft model. The control problem was introduced by Kaya and Noakes in 2003<bibref>Kaya2003</bibref> and aims at controlling an aircraft in a time-optimal way from an initial state to a terminal state.
The mathematical equations form a small-scale ODE Model. The interior point equality conditions fix both initial and terminal values of the differential states.
The optimal integer control functions shows bang bang behavior. The problem is furthermore interesting as it should be reformulated equivalently.
Contents
Mathematical formulation
For almost everywhere the mixed-integer optimal control problem is given by
is the angle of attack in radians, is the pitch angle, is the pitch rate in rad/s, and the control function is the tail deflection angle in radians. This model goes back to Garrard<bibref>Garrard1977</bibref>.
In the control problem, both initial as terminal values of the differential states are fixed.
Reformulation
The control w(t) is restricted to take values from a finite set only. Hence, the control problem can be reformulated equivalently to
with . Note that there is a bijection between optimal solutions of the two problems.
Reference solutions
The optimal objective value of this problem given in Sager 2005<bibref>Sager2005</bibref> is . An even better solution is that corresponds to the rightmost plot.
Source Code
C
The differential equations in C code:
double x1 = xd[0]; double x2 = xd[1]; double x3 = xd[2]; double u0 = -0.05236; double u1 = 0.05236; double f00, f10, f20; double f01, f11, f21; f00 = - 0.877*x1 + x3 - 0.088*x1*x3 + 0.47*x1*x1 - 0.019*x2*x2 - x1*x1*x3 + 3.846*x1*x1*x1 - 0.215*u0 + 0.28*x1*x1*u0 + 0.47*x1*u0*u0 + 0.63*u0*u0*u0; f10 = x3; f20 = - 4.208*x1 - 0.396*x3 - 0.47*x1*x1 - 3.564*x1*x1*x1 - 20.967*u0 + 6.265*x1*x1*u0 + 46*x1*u0*u0 + 61.4*u0*u0*u0; f01 = - 0.877*x1 + x3 - 0.088*x1*x3 + 0.47*x1*x1 - 0.019*x2*x2 - x1*x1*x3 + 3.846*x1*x1*x1 - 0.215*u1 + 0.28*x1*x1*u1 + 0.47*x1*u1*u1 + 0.63*u1*u1*u1; f11 = x3; f21 = - 4.208*x1 - 0.396*x3 - 0.47*x1*x1 - 3.564*x1*x1*x1 -20.967*u1 + 6.265*x1*x1*u1 + 46*x1*u1*u1 + 61.4*u1*u1*u1; rhs[0] = u[0]*f01 + (1-u[0])*f00; rhs[1] = u[0]*f11 + (1-u[0])*f10; rhs[2] = u[0]*f21 + (1-u[0])*f20;
Miscellaneous and Further Reading
See <bibref>Kaya2003</bibref> and <bibref>Sager2005</bibref> for details.
References
<bibreferences/>